<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 92 percent of Australian women say gender balance not equal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.australianwomenonline.com/92-percent-of-australian-women-say-gender-balance-not-equal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.australianwomenonline.com/92-percent-of-australian-women-say-gender-balance-not-equal/</link>
	<description>The hub of home-grown inspirational women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:45:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.australianwomenonline.com/92-percent-of-australian-women-say-gender-balance-not-equal/comment-page-1/#comment-3079</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.australianwomenonline.com/?p=19802#comment-3079</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen unconscious gender bias in place on so many occasions that I see this as a much more important issue to tackle than glass ceilings. Why in talent and succession planning meetings do people leaders still discuss a woman&#039;s marital status and whether she has kids (or is likely to have them) as an indication of her flight risk? (yes, it really does happen.) Why are men usually described by their people leaders in these discussions in terms of their competency attributes (the sorts of projects and work he&#039;s undertaken of past), whereas a woman is described to those not familiar with her in terms of her physical attributes (what she looks like). Why do we still assume that leadership roles cannot be performed on flexible terms (when all the technology has long existed for work to be performed and monitored remotely and on flexible terms)? These are all examples of unconscious bias that I&#039;ve seen in play time and time again.  They perpetuate the stereotype that leaders are male, that their life revolves around their work and that the old way is the only way. We need to bring examples of bias and stereotypes out into the open and give women the confidence of knowing they&#039;re not alone in experiencing these issues - this will give women the confidence and energy to keep pushing on when they&#039;re faced with such obstacles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen unconscious gender bias in place on so many occasions that I see this as a much more important issue to tackle than glass ceilings. Why in talent and succession planning meetings do people leaders still discuss a woman&#8217;s marital status and whether she has kids (or is likely to have them) as an indication of her flight risk? (yes, it really does happen.) Why are men usually described by their people leaders in these discussions in terms of their competency attributes (the sorts of projects and work he&#8217;s undertaken of past), whereas a woman is described to those not familiar with her in terms of her physical attributes (what she looks like). Why do we still assume that leadership roles cannot be performed on flexible terms (when all the technology has long existed for work to be performed and monitored remotely and on flexible terms)? These are all examples of unconscious bias that I&#8217;ve seen in play time and time again.  They perpetuate the stereotype that leaders are male, that their life revolves around their work and that the old way is the only way. We need to bring examples of bias and stereotypes out into the open and give women the confidence of knowing they&#8217;re not alone in experiencing these issues &#8211; this will give women the confidence and energy to keep pushing on when they&#8217;re faced with such obstacles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

